8 Comments
Oct 16, 2023Liked by Melody Wright

wonderful article. thank you

Expand full comment
author

Thank you so much and thank you for reading!

Expand full comment
Oct 16, 2023Liked by Melody Wright

Those additional article headlines seem cheerful. 🫣

Expand full comment
founding
Oct 16, 2023Liked by Melody Wright

Once again, I really appreciate your work! Thank you.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you for reading!

Expand full comment
Oct 16, 2023Liked by Melody Wright

Your stats are getting eye-popping. Yet it’s all so quiet - perhaps like that eerie calm and peaceful feeling that exists right before the massive storm strikes - you know, calm before the storm? (Maybe I have that impression because I live abroad).

Expand full comment
author

Yes - this week was a bit surreal.

Expand full comment

Historical months of supply are available from YCharts: https://ycharts.com/indicators/us_existing_singlefamily_home_months_supply

(apparently months of supply were way higher in the 1980s-1990s, like around 9-10 months for years at a time... I suspect Wolf Street is right that the "natural rate" of months of supply are going down over time as technology speeds up, and so for reasons that have nothing to do with supply and demand: https://wolfstreet.com/2023/08/23/each-of-the-past-7-julys-had-the-lowest-inventory-of-existing-homes-on-record-inventory-fell-for-16-years-one-big-reason-technology/ )

Wolf Street also has some of that months supply data charted for 2010s https://wolfstreet.com/2024/01/19/amid-collapsed-demand-for-existing-homes-prices-drop-further-supply-highest-for-any-december-since-2018-new-listings-come-out-of-the-woodwork/

And Calculated Risk for 2000s https://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/09/existing-home-sales-at-41-million-saar.html

Interesting that prices were appreciating 15% per year in 2005 at ~4 months of supply, similar to the 20% appreciation in 2020-2022 at 1-2 months of supply. When we last had ~4 months of supply in 2017-2019, prices were only appreciating ~4% per year. This suggests to me that as Wolf Street argues, the "balanced" number of months supply is going down overtime, so that 5+ months supply is probably enough to start causing stagnating prices if not declines -- not 6 months supply, which was still the rule back in 2006 when homebuying was much slower (https://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2006/05/existing-home-sales-slip.html#:~:text=Many%20agents%20feel%206%20months%20of%20supply%20is%20the%20danger%20zone%20%2D%20any%20additional%20supply%20and%20prices%20will%20start%20to%20fall)

Expand full comment